Skip to main content

Call for Papers for the international conference: ‘Eurovision Song Contest and Humanities and Social Sciences: Issues, questions and perspectives

April 1, 2 & 3, 2026, Paris, Campus des Cordeliers

Since its inception in 1956, the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) has launched the careers of global stars such as ABBA and Celine Dion. Multicultural and multilingual, and unmatched in scale outside the Olympic and Paralympic Games, the ESC has become a fixture of the European public media landscape. In 2025, the contest reached 166 million television viewers and garnered 1.8 billion views across its social media platforms. As a ceremonial media event (Dayan & Katz, 1996), the ESC carries significant economic, political, and social implications.

On the eve of its 70th anniversary, the ESC is far from being an outdated or kitschy public spectacle. Instead, it crystallizes numerous complex issues. It serves as a platform where Europe and its neighbors express national identities and shared imaginaries, while also reflecting geopolitical rivalries—from East-West tensions during the Cold War to more recent conflicts such as Armenia/Azerbaijan, Ukraine/Russia, and Israel/Palestine. Positioned at the intersection of the cultural and media industries, the ESC raises questions about the construction of norms and the representation of certain populations. Finally, the ESC prompts critical inquiry into cultural legitimacy and its counterpoint—the eclecticism of taste—raising the question: what does it mean today to ‘love the Eurovision Song Contest’?

Studying the ESC thus entails exploring the intersections of identity, collective rituals, and social media participation, while also illuminating the complex political and social dynamics within the cultural and media industries. To what extent can the humanities and social sciences help us to illuminate, understand, and critically analyze the social, cultural, and political issues—both past and present—embodied in the ESC?

In recent years, a growing body of research has examined the ESC through a variety of disciplinary and methodological approaches. This body of work engages with multiple disciplinary perspectives, including explorations of national and cultural identities in Europe (Fricker & Gluhovic (eds.), 2013; Jordan, 2014; Neves, 2017; Panea, 2020; Venon, 2007), as well as approaches rooted in musicology and popular culture (Björnberg, 1987; Fornäs, 2017; Shuker, 2016; Raykoff, 2021; Tragaki (ed.), 2013), cultural sociology and fan studies (Le Guern, 2007; Vieira Lopes, 2023), cultural studies (Carniel, 2018; Coleman, 2008; Salgó, 2017), history (Vuletic, 2018), communication and media studies (Appiotti, Bolz, Boittiaux & Neuvillers, 2025; Pajala, 2011), education studies (Cremona, 2022), and gender studies (Baker, 2024; Imre, 2020; Lemish, 2004; Vänskä & Tuhkanen (eds.), 2007).

The conference “Eurovision Song Contest and the Humanities and Social Sciences” seeks to build upon the collective initiatives that have helped establish an interdisciplinary state of the art in ESC research (Raykoff & Tobin, (eds.), 2007; Fricker & Gluhovic, (eds.), 2013; Dubin, Vuletic & Obregón, (eds.), 2023). Adopting an interdisciplinary and critical perspective, the conference aims to explore and interrogate emerging approaches and studies related to the contest and its multiple dimensions.

The discussions at this conference will be structured around the following central research questions:

  • How are the humanities and social sciences approaching the ESC? Conversely, how might the ESC stimulate and challenge the theoretical frameworks and methodologies of these disciplines?
  • Is the ESC an original social object with its own distinct questions and methods, or does it resemble other research topics that pose similar analytical challenges?
  • Does current research on the ESC reflect a profound renewal of academic approaches, or is it primarily shaped by long-term dynamics involving the revision and adaptation of existing themes, objects, and analytical frameworks?
  • What do analyses of the ESC contribute to the humanities and social sciences, particularly in terms of methodological tools, and interpretive perspectives?
  • How do disciplinary orientations and the ethnocentric perspectives of researchers shape their interpretations of the ESC and influence their research practices?

This conference also aims to underscore the importance of diverse perspectives, disciplines, and research traditions, recognizing that only an interdisciplinary and intercultural approach to the ESC can fully capture and update the current state of scholarship on the subject. As such, paper proposals are welcome from a wide range of disciplines and methodologies, including but not limited to: anthropology, communication studies, cultural studies, law, economics, gender studies, tourism studies, aesthetics, geography, history, fan studies, musicology, narratology, performance and theater studies, political science, linguistics, semiotics, and sociology. In particular, papers are expected to include:

  1. A critical and reflective presentation of the concepts, paradigms, and methodologies employed to address the questions raised by the conference. Special attention should be given to the identification of the disciplinary fields involved and the ways in which they are brought into dialogue. Contributions should demonstrate how these interdisciplinary engagements offer an original lens for understanding the ESC.
  2. An analysis grounded in verifiable and contestable empirical material, such as ethnographic fieldwork, textual or media corpora, databases, or other forms of structured data, allowing for critical debate and scholarly validation.

To this end, we propose several thematic areas for consideration. These are not exhaustive and are intended as a guiding framework to assist in the drafting of paper proposals.

  1. As stated above, we are interested in the epistemologies and methodologies employed in conducting field research on the ESC:
  • Between the “aca-fan” stance (Jenkins, 2006: 4) and the claim to axiological neutrality, how can researchers study the ESC while maintaining reflexivity, critical distance, and scientific rigor?
  • What approaches are commonly favored to define the ESC as a research subject, and what are the underlying reasons for these preferences?
  • In what ways do the social, political, and historical contexts of research shape the situated knowledge (Haraway, 1988) of scholars studying the ESC?
  • From the Super Bowl halftime show to the Olympic Games (Gilbert & Lo, 2007; Baker, 2016; Baker, Atkinson, Grabher & Howcroft, 2025), television competitions (Leveneur-Martel, 2021) and music festivals (Delanty, Giorgi & Sassatelli (eds.), 2011; Djakouane & Négrier, 2021), what comparisons and dialogues can be drawn between the ESC and other cultural phenomena and concrete research topics?
  • How can alternative research methods and protocols, including action research and research-creation, open new ways for investigating the ESC?
  • Finally, how do methodological and scientific experiments, for example related to digital research methods in the humanities and social sciences and digital humanities, renew scientific questions and research protocols concerning the ESC?
  1. The role of the ESC as a mirror reflecting socio-cultural and political issues, tensions, and debates—an aspect that has drawn increasing scholarly attention in recent years—also deserves to be critically examined.
  • To what extent does the ESC function as a catalyst, a revealer, or a mirror of past and contemporary social, political, and cultural issues?
  • How can we move beyond the conventional dichotomy of apoliticism vs. politicization often applied to analyze the ESC, and instead develop a more nuanced understanding of the actors, dynamics, and forms of politicization and depoliticization involved in the contest?
  • Why—and through what mechanisms—is the ESC frequently connoted, or even disqualified, as an outdated, kitschy, or culturally illegitimate form? How can we (re)qualify the cultural hierarchies and tastes that shape perceptions of the ESC?
  • Why does the ESC crystallize a wide array of debates, social discourses, values, and ideologies? In what ways are these performed and staged in the public sphere through interpretive conflicts, controversies, and scandals?
  1. We also place great importance on the various social actors involved in the ESC. Our aim is to better understand the relational, interactional, and even ‘cooperative-competitive’ (Legavre, 2011) dynamics that structure the interactions among actors within the ‘Eurovision world’.

This line of research invites submissions that explore—whether through monographic case studies or comparative analyses—the understanding of one or more types of social actors gravitating around the ESC, such as:

  • The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) ; 
  • Public service media members of the EBU and broadcasters of the contest ; 
  • Artists and their “cooperation chains” (Becker, 1988): record labels, managers, musicians, dancers, producers, technicians, etc. ; 
  • Private or public media providing coverage of the competition (Wolther, 2006; Pajala, 2011): journalists, commentators, content creators, influencers, fan media, etc. ; 
  • The audiences (Ballarini & Ségur (eds.), 2017), non-audiences, and fans of the ESC, in all their diversity of practices and imaginations related to the competition ; 
  • Politicians, and how they have approached the ESC over the years ; 
  • ESC sponsors and partner brands. 
  1. The forms and formats of the ESC could also serve as a focal point for discussion at the conference, particularly in relation to the following aspects:
  • A study of performances (songs, lyrics, staging, etc.);
  • The (multi-)media dimension of the contest: the ESC is a concert stage, a television show, and an unprecedented catalyst for a variety of formats (videos, photos, memes, rankings, predictions, polls, etc.) on the web and on digital social networks;
  • The ESC as an incubator for technical and technological innovations;
  • The dramaturgy of the contest, with a continuous evolution of its rules and staging (voting rules, announcement of points, etc.);
  • The spectacularization of the ESC’s staging: evident both in the increasing professionalization of its shows and artistic performances, as well as in the substantial annual budget allocated to the event’s organization, production, multiple rehearsals, promotion, and broadcasting.
  1. We also believe that the links between the ESC and the territories provide a valuable gateway for dialogue on the following approaches and themes:
  • The value of various scientific approaches, such as geopolitics (Yair, 1995; Yair & Maman, 1996) or socio-history, in understanding: the social and symbolic construction of territories, borders, and cultural identities through the lens of the ESC; the construction of territorial images and imaginaries through diverse discursive strategies (such as narratives of national and cultural identities, and the production and circulation of stereotypes) and semiotic strategies (such as video “postcards” presenting artists, host countries and candidates, costumes, flags, national symbols, etc.);
  • The role of the ESC in territorial development strategies: particular attention may be given to the economic, territorial, and tourism ecosystem of the ESC in relation to the host country and city. This includes examining its most contested dimensions (Shepherd, 2021), such as public administrations (tourist offices, information centers) and local authorities (city, region, etc.) as well as tourists.
  • The dialectical tensions between territorialization and deterritorialization (do Carmo Cruz, 2019), as well as between globalization and glocalization (Robertson, 1994) of the ESC.

In all cases, fieldwork, corpus-based studies, and reflexive approaches to the ESC’s epistemological and methodological frameworks will be central to our discussions.

Aligned with the founding of the Eurovision Research Network (“Europe and the ‘New’ Europe Research Network,” 2009 in Fricker, Gluhovic, 2013: 3; 6), this conference aims to serve as a catalyst for the formation of an international scholarly network exploring the ESC through interdisciplinary and cross-thematic perspectives.

In a second phase, a collection of double-blind peer-reviewed articles in English is planned for publication in a specialized academic volume.

Calendar 

  • Publication of the call for papers: September 1, 2025
  • Paper proposal submission deadline: October 15, 2025 
  • Notification of paper acceptance: December 10, 2025 

Submission guidelines

Proposals should be sent by October 15, 2025 to the following email address : escconference.paris@gmail.com 

Please submit paper proposals in French or English as follows : 

  1. A file (in .pdf format) containing: the title of the paper, a short bio-bibliographical note (maximum 500 characters, including surname, first name, and institutional affiliation), an email address, and up to 5 keywords;
  2. An anonymous file (in .pdf format) containing: the title of the paper, the paper proposal of no more than 3,000 characters including spaces, excluding bibliographical references.

As a reminder, paper proposals are expected to include:

  1. A concise overview of the research context;
  2. A clear and well-structured presentation of the research question, along with the key concepts, paradigms, and methodologies used to engage with the themes of the conference;
  3. A presentation of fieldwork-based analysis (e.g., ethnographic studies, corpora, textual analysis, databases, etc.). If the research is still in progress, please provide initial hypotheses and a description of the research protocol.

All information related to this call for papers and the international conference is also available on https://encore-network.org.  

References 

Appiotti, S., Bolz, L., Boittiaux, J., & Neuvillers, M.-C. (8 avril 2025). Mutations de la couverture médiatique du concours Eurovision de la chanson en France (analyse exploratoire de la presse écrite et de la télévision 1998–2024). Presentation at the seminar “Penser l’Eurovision”.

Baker, C. (2016). The ‘gay Olympics’? The Eurovision Song Contest and the politics of LGBT/European belonging. European Journal of International Relations, 23(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116633278

Baker, C. (2024). Lion of Love: Representations of Russian Homosexuality and Homophobia in Netflix’s Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga. Historical Reflections, 50(2), 61–76.

Baker, C., Atkinson, D., Grabher, B., & Howcroft, M. (2025). Bridging the ‘sport/culture silo’: the Eurovision Song Contest and its lessons for sporting and cultural mega-events. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2025.2521115 

Ballarini, L., & Ségur, C. (eds.). (2017). Devenir public. Modalités et enjeux (Série « Media critic »). Éditions Mare et Martin.

Björnberg, A. (1987). En liten sång som alla andra : Melodifestivalen 1959–1983 [A Little Song Like All the Others: Melodifestivalen 1959–1983] [Doctoral thesis, University of Göteborg].

Carniel, J. (2018). Understanding the Eurovision Song Contest in multicultural Australia. Palgrave Macmillan.

Coleman, S. (2008). Why is the Eurovision Song Contest Ridiculous? Exploring a Spectacle of Embarrassment, Irony and Identity. Popular Communication, 6(3), 127–140.

Cremona, G. (2022). The Eurovision University Study Unit and Its Pedagogic Value: A Critical Evaluation of Public and Media Reaction Towards Innovation in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 13–23.

Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1996). La télévision cérémonielle : anthropologie et histoire en direct. Presses universitaires de France.

Delanty, G., Giorgi, L., & Sassatelli, M. (eds.). (2011). Festivals and the cultural public sphere. Routledge.

Djakouane, A., & Négrier, E. (2021). Festivals, territoire et société. Ministère de la Culture – DEPS. https://doi.org/10.3917/deps.djako.2021.01

Do Carmo Cruz, V. (2019). Territoire et processus de territorialisation : usages et conceptions méthodologiques dans le domaine de la géographie. In Action publique, dynamiques sociales et pauvreté (1‑). Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pulm.21706

Dubin, A., Vuletic, D., & Obregón, A. (eds.). (2022). The Eurovision Song Contest as a cultural phenomenon: From concert halls to the halls of academia. Routledge. 

Fornäs, J. (2017). Euro-Visions: East European Narratives in Televised Popular Music. In J. Fornäs (Dir.), Europe Faces Europe: Narratives from Its Eastern Half (pp. 179–236). Intellect.

Fricker, K., & Gluhovic, M. (eds.). (2013). Performing the “New” Europe. Identities, Feelings and Politics in the Eurovision Song Contest. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gilbert, H., & Lo, J. (2007). Cosmopolitics: Cross-cultural Transactions in Australasia. Palgrave Macmillan.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Imre, A. (2020). The Eurovision Song Contest: Queer Nationalism. In E. Thompson & J. Mittell (eds.), How to Watch Television (2nd ed., pp. 193–202). NYU Press.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York University Press.

Jordan, P. (2014). The Modern Fairy Tale: Nation Branding, National Identity and the Eurovision Song Contest in Estonia. University of Tartu Press.

Le Guern, P. (2007). Aimer l’Eurovision, une faute de goût ? Une approche sociologique du fan club français de l’Eurovision. Réseaux, 25(145), 231–265.

Legavre, J.-B. (2011). Entre conflit et coopération. Les journalistes et les communicants comme « associés-rivaux ». Communication & langages, 169, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0336150011003097

Lemish, D. (2004). « My Kind of Campfire »: The Eurovision Song Contest and Israeli Gay Men. Popular Communication, 2(1), 41–63.

Leveneur-Martel, L. (2021). Les cérémonies Miss France, de la télévision à Twitter : Une ritualisation des commentaires (2015–2019). Réseaux, 230(6), 171–214. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.230.0171

Neves, M. (2017). Croatia in the Eurovision Song Contest: From an Anti-War Message to the Recognition of a Cultural Tradition. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 48(1), 133–147.

Pajala, M. (2011). Making Television Historical: Cultural memory of the Eurovision Song Contest in the Finnish media 1961–2005. Media History, 17(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2011.602859

Panea, J. L. (2020). Las escenografías del Festival de Eurovisión: Estética, tecnología e identidad cultural al albor de la reconstrucción europea (1956–1993). Ámbitos: Revista de Estudios de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 49, 23–40.

Raykoff, I. (2021). Another Song for Europe. Music, Taste, and Values in the Eurovision Song Contest. Routledge.

Raykoff, I., & Tobin, R. D. (eds.). (2007). A Song for Europe: Popular Music and Politics in the Eurovision Song Contest. Routledge.

Robertson, R. (1994). Globalisation or glocalisation? Journal of International Communication, 1(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.1994.9751780

Salgó, E. (2017). ‘Rise like a Phoenix’: A New Anthem for (Federal) Europe. In Images from Paradise: The Visual Communication of the European Union’s Federalist Utopia (pp. 141–159). Berghahn Books.

Shepherd, J. (2021). ‘I’m not your toy’ : rejecting a tourism boycott. Tourism Recreation Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2021.1998874

Shuker, R. (2016). Understanding Popular Music Culture. Routledge.

Tragaki, D. (Ed.). (2013). Empire of Song: Europe and Nation in the Eurovision Song Contest. Scarecrow Press.

Vänskä, A., & Tuhkanen, M. (eds.). (2007). Special Issue: “Queer Eurovision”. SQS: Journal of Queer Studies in Finland, 2(2). https://journal.fi/sqs/issue/view/3606

Venon, F. (2007). L’Eurovision et les frontières culturelles de l’Europe. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. http://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/5633

Vieira Lopes, S. (2023). Música, televisão, memória e representação: Um estudo do Festival RTP da Canção (1964–2020) [Doctoral thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa].

Vuletic, D. (2018). Postwar Europe and the Eurovision Song Contest. Bloomsbury.

Wolther, I. (2006). Der Eurovision Song Contest als Mittel national-kultureller Repräsentation. Königshausen & Neumann.

Yair, G. (1995). Unite, Unite, Europe: The Political and Cultural Structures of Europe as Reflected in the Eurovision Song Contest. Social Networks, 17(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(95)00253-K

Yair, G., & Maman, D. (1996). The Persistent Structure of Hegemony in the Eurovision Song Contest. Acta Sociologica, 39(3), 309–325. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4194833

Organizing committee

Sébastien Appiotti, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université

Lisa Bolz, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université

Johan Boittiaux, LabSIC, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord

Philippe Le Guern, PTAC, Université Rennes 2

Marie-Caroline Neuvillers, Centre Norbert Elias, Avignon Université

Scientific committee

Sébastien Appiotti, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université

Catherine Baker, University of Hull

Alix Bénistant, LabSIC, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord

Johan Boittiaux, LabSIC, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord

Lisa Bolz, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université

Marcin Bogucki, Instytut Kultury Polskej, University of Warsaw

Isabel Campelo, NOVA University of Lisbon

Jessica Carniel, University of Southern Queensland

Juliette Charbonneaux, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université

Thierry Devars, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université

Karen Fricker, Brock University

Thibault Grison, GERiiCO, Université de Lille

Jonathan Hendrickx, University of Copenhagen

Zhao Alexandre Huang, Dicen-IDF, Université Gustave Eiffel

Virginie Julliard, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université

Valeriya Korablyova, University Charles Michel

Philippe Le Guern, PTAC, Université Rennes 2

Louisa Martin-Chevalier, IreMuS, Sorbonne Université

Marie-Caroline Neuvillers, Centre Norbert Elias, Avignon Université

Ivan Raykoff, New School, New York

Simon Renoir, Centre Norbert Elias, Avignon Université

Sofia Vieira Lopes, NOVA University of Lisbon

Hécate Vergopoulos, GRIPIC, CELSA – Sorbonne Université